“Sabermetrics Comes to the Classroom”

Standford University Professor, Daphne Koller in this video introduces her startup, Coursera.  Coursera is an innovative approach to on line learning. On the site are on line courses from top universities, but with quizzes and assignments added to each lesson. They are all free and anyone can go through the course, submit the work, and earn a certificate at the end. There are no credits, but everything is graded and you can interact with others taking the course. There are courses starting throughout the year.

The most exciting part for me, not only do I get to go back to university, but also, they Dr. Koller and her colleagues are collecting data on how people process knowledge. Every correct or incorrect answer given on a quiz is analyzed and millions of data point help them understand how students perceive lectures, examples, etc.

In a traditional classroom, a teacher grades a set of exams of say, at ISB, a maximum of 30 papers. Often, trends appear that makes a teacher think about how they presented information. For example, when I was teaching science, a student once misinterpreted percentage error as percentage of air. 

Now with Coursera, instead of a class of 30, there are thousands of sample answers. Also, with on line learning, every question and answer can be entered into a database. What an amazing opportunity for educators to learn more about how students think and interpret or misinterpret lectures, presentations, and examples.

Technology is changing how we can do things. In one of my favorite sports, baseball, the video analysis of every single pitch and swing of the bat, has changed how much evidence coaches and managers can collect on player performance. These new statistics derived from the new technology are called “sabermetrics.” With Coursera, sabermetrics are now coming to education.

The list of courses  is long and I hope I can find the time to take a course or two.

 

Upper School Dragon Dispatch – August 24, 2012

Each week I write a letter to the parents that is posted in our school newsletter, The Dragon Dispatch. I use it similarly to the blog with more of focus on updating parents on school events, helping them with parenting suggestions, and focusing on student achievement. Below is my first Dragon Dispatch of the year, which is published every Friday. I lead with the video of our Upper School’s opening ceremony.

[flickr video=http://www.flickr.com/photos/chaddles/2402990826]

Dear Upper School Parents,

We had a successful start to the school year! We implemented a new timetable this year and it went relatively smoothly. It is always a challenge to assess the needs of the new students, adjust to unexpected enrolment changes, and then fit the schedule to best meet the needs of the students.

Parents should mark their calendars for Tuesday September 4th from 7:00 PM – 9:00 PM for our Upper School Open House. Parents are invited to come and meet all of the teachers. The teachers will be explaining their program and answering questions you may have regarding homework, technology, etc. It is a very valuable evening for helping parents supports their children in learning. More details will be forthcoming.

The other event you should be aware of is the student retreat. Grades 6-12 will be going on different  (per grade level) bonding trips from Thursday September 6 – Saturday September 8. The High School trips will be one night stay and returning on Friday evening, and the Middle School trips will be two nights and returning on Saturday. The purpose of the retreats is to the students to form closer relationships with each other and their teachers.

Adolescence is many times the most turbulent stage of the human life cycle. Adjusting to new classmates, a new grade, schedule, etc. can be emotional for teenagers. They may be venting a bit at home as they work through finding their place in their social group and figuring out the different teaching styles and subject areas. The best thing a parent can do early in the school year is to listen. It is tempting to try to problem solve, but it is best to wait for a while and see how the situations play out. Of course, if it is a serious issue a student is experiencing, we are always happy to help you and the student.

Finally, below is a short video of our opening ceremony from Monday. The students planted a White Ash (Fraxinus Americana) tree while the student body watched in our new beautiful amphitheatre. The message to the community was that the learning students do in the upper school will help them blossom and grow into productive, happy, citizens who will try to make the world a better place for humanity.

Regards,

Bill Kralovec

What is the Learner Profile?

Ms. Anna Lettinga and Ms. Milica Jocic plan a lesson concerning Communicators.

 

On Thursday August 16th, we took time out the practicalities of getting ready for the opening day of school to do some professional development. The goal of the afternoon professional development was for the PK-12 faculty to work together to understand the IB Learner Profile. The “Learner Profile” is in our Vision Statement for our school a vital part of the curriculum of an IB World School. Below are my the notes from the major concepts from the afternoon session.

What is the Learner Profile?

  • They are the values that inspire and focus our work
  • It is what IB means by “International-mindedness”
  • They connect the 3 IB programmes.

Schools that implement the Learner Profile

  •  are truly collaborative
  •  strengthen professionalism
  • invest in PD (professional development)

The LP is a tool for whole-school-based reflection and analysis. How can we know the LP is “strongly evident” and “embraced by all members” ?? That is a question we will be answering in our new Strategic Plan. One part of the plan is to put the Learner Profile front and center in our school and make it more understood (and more importantly lived) in our community.

I was thinking of a method of memorizing the 10 attributes of the Learner Profile. I’ve categorized them to help me remember them:

1)Academics -knowledgeable, thinkers, inquirers,

2) Emotional – principled, open-mindedness, caring, balanced

3) All – communicators, risk-takers, Reflective

In reflecting on the workshop, I decided to make a nice laminated color copy of the of the LP for teachers to post in their rooms. The sheet will have the descriptors under each attribute. I am hoping teachers and students will refer to them often.

As a follow-on, I would like to explore the term “international-mindedness” and how it relates to the attributes. It would also be good to figure out a way people could self-assess themselves and document where they are on each of the attributes. Suzanne, our PYP Coordinator, suggested a passport that continues with them during their school years. She also would like some student to make an App to generate ideas and activities with the Learner Profile. Many people IB schools throughout the world would download it.

 

 

“The Change Process” A Talk by Dennis Copeland

We had a guest speaker a couple of days ago, Dr. Dennis Copeland. He is an Elementary Principal at Randolph Township, New Jersey Schools; he is also on a Board of Education for another school district. He is a former HS Principal as well, 13 years total in administration. His talk was entitled “The Change Process,” and I was impressed with his organization and ideas. One item I liked about the talk, was that he had a clear understanding of what he believed in, especially with his use of educational or leadership theory. His style of leadership is “Servant Leadership” and he defined clearly his leadership ideas.

  • 1)      Clarity (Bolman and Deal – 4 frames)
  • 2)      Decision Making (Senge – 5 disciplines Systems Thinking)
  • 3)      Communication (Covey – 7 habits)
  • 4)      Data Use (ASCD)
  • Seek first to understand, then be understood (COVEY)
  • 4 Frames Political (power)  Symbolic (rituals) Human Resource (people involved) Structural (systems, processes)
  • Data / Research / Best Practices
  • Systems Thinking – personal mastery / team learning / shared vision / mental models

There are five parts to the change process.

1)      (most important) – clarity What are your non-negotiables? – Who Am I? Where Am I going? I believe…

2)      Decision-Making – It is important to let people know how you reached a decision. You will make decisions with your head and your heart.

3)      Communication – Who should be informed before, during, and after? You should put it on the white board.  Bring in your brain trust.

4)      Data Use – (best practices, use data to justify the decision) “Your school is only as strong as your weakest students.” Dr. Copeland suggested the following resources to keep up with the latest educational research.

American Educational Research Association

They have a national conference every year.  Teachers College out of Columbia a daily list serve with new research study TC Record.edu  – HGSE.edu  – Harvard Graduate School of Education with a list serve every 2 weeks – Journals PDK (Phi Delta Kappan.org) – ASCD.org – EdWeek.org (Education Week) also has a list serve

5)      Shared Leadership – It’s okay to let go! Find your supporters (who is on the bus?)

Dr. Copeland definitely opened my eyes to using more research to drive my decisions. I will subscribe to the list serves that he suggested. I will also do a bit of research with his models of decision making. That is something that I can improve on, being a bit more organized with making decisions and documenting the process. It will also help me anticipating problems.

Educational Leadership Policy Standards

I am taking a closer look at the Educational Administration Standards that I will be tested on when I apply for US state licensure. The Educational Leadership Policy Standards were published in 2008 by the National Policy Board for Educational Administration (NPBEA). They were updated from the 1996 Standards for School Leaders that were written by the Interstate School Leaders Licensure Consortium (ISLLC).  The standards are used by 43 state education departments in their entirety or as a template to developing their own standards.

The big idea with the standards is that the primary responsibility of principals/directors is to improve teaching and learning for all children. The standards are a foundation or a starting point for many areas including professional growth, license requirements, evaluations, job descriptions, etc. They are based on the effective education leadership research of the Wallace Foundation. The research shows that leadership is second only to classroom instruction among school related factors that influence student learning.

Below are the goals put into my own words and summarized to help me remember and understand them.

1)      (Vision of Learning) – Promote the mission statement of the school and use it to set goals, and plans for the school.

2)      (Professional Learning Community) – Nurture a collaborative, serious, professional culture of teachers that looks at student results and continuously finds ways to improve student progress.

3)      (Safe and Effective Learning Environment) – Manage school operations well including time, resources, teacher-learders, etc.

4)      (Community) – Get the most out of the local community with positive relations with families (understand culture) and analyze pertinent data

5)      (Integrity) –Act and make decisions in an ethical and legal manner, promoting social justice for all.

6)      (Politics) Influence local, national, international decisions affecting student learning, advocate for families, anticipate educational trends

Below are the standards in full. In the NPBEA report, Appendix 2 is a good overview page of the standards (1-6).

Educational Leadership Policy Standards: ISLLC 2008
as adopted by the National Policy Board for Educational Administration (NPBEA) – December 12, 2007 

Standard 1: An education leader promotes the success of every student by facilitating the development, articulation, implementation, and stewardship of a vision of learning that is shared and supported by all stakeholders

Functions:

  • Collaboratively develop and implement a shared vision and mission.
  • Collect and use data to identify goals, assess organizational effectiveness, and promote organizational learning
  • Create and implement plans to achieve goals
  • Promote continuous and sustainable improvement
  • Monitor and evaluate progress and revise plans

Standard 2: An education leader promotes the success of every student by advocating, nurturing and sustaining a school culture and instructional program conducive to student learning and staff professional growth. 

Functions:

  • Nurture and sustain a culture of collaboration, trust, learning, and high expectations
  • Create a comprehensive, rigorous, and coherent curricular program
  • Create a personalized and motivating learning environment for students
  • Supervise instruction
  • Develop assessment and accountability systems to monitor student progress.
  • Develop the instructional and leadership capacity of staff
  • Maximize time spent on quality instruction
  • Promote the use of the most effective and appropriate technologies to support teaching and learning
  • Monitor and evaluate the impact of the instructional program

Standard 3: An education leader promotes the success of every student by ensuring management of the organization, operation, and resources for a safe, efficient, and effective learning environment.

Functions

  • Monitor and evaluate the management and operational systems
  • Obtain, allocate, align, and efficiently utilize human, fiscal, and technological resources
  • Promote and protect the welfare and safety of students and staff
  • Develop the capacity for distributed leadership
  • Ensure teacher and organizational time is focused to support quality instruction and student learning

Standard 4: An education leader promotes the success of every student by collaborating with faculty and community members, responding to diverse community interests and needs, and mobilizing community resources.

Functions

  • Collect and analyze data and information pertinent to the educational environment
  • Promote understanding, appreciation, and use of the community’s diverse cultural, social, and intellectual resources
  • Build and sustain positive relationships with families and caregivers
  • Build and sustain productive relationships with community partners

Standard 5: An education leader promotes the success of every student by acting with integrity, fairness, and in an ethical manner.

Functions

  • Ensure a system of accountability for every student’s academic and social success
  • Model principles of self-awareness, reflective practice, transparency, and ethical behavior
  • Safeguard the values of democracy, equity, and diversity
  • Consider and evaluate the potential moral and legal consequences of decision-making
  • Promote social justice and ensure that individual student needs inform all aspects of schooling

Standard 6: An education leader promotes the success of every student by understanding, responding to, and influencing the political, social, economic, legal, and cultural context.

Functions

  • Advocate for children, families, and caregivers
  • Act to influence local, district, state, and national decisions affecting student learning
  • Assess, analyze, and anticipate emerging trends and initiatives in order to adapt leadership strategies

Michael Fullan – Educational Change

In the second day of the course, we spent time discussing Michael Fullan’s book, Educational Change at the Local Level.  The book was published in the early 1990s, but Dr. Konzal, our instructor, says that he cannot find a better book about educational administration that is more recent. The class members agree that even though the book is over 20 years old, many of the same issues and characteristics of education have not changed. Each group was assigned a chapter to present to the class.

My full notes on the book can be found in a later blog post. I will be posting them to Scribd so I can refer to them later. This blog post is just selected items to reflect upon from the presentations.

The Student – This was our group’s assignment. The surprise was in the studies referenced in the chapter, it showed that only about 20% of the students in any class participate actively in class. And during a school day, only about 1 and ½ hours of time is spent by students cognitively focused on academic learning. The big point of the chapter was that in the 1970’s and 1980’s, students did not have input into what and how they were learning. Researchers saw improvement with the advent of cooperative learning and individual-centered learning techniques. This was before the internet and today education is even more individualized.

The other interesting study from 1980, classified students into four groups, with only the first two groups having contact with the teacher. Most importantly, students change categories to match the teaching style of the teacher.

  • 1)      Attention Seekers – 20%
  • 2)      Intermittent Workers – 36%
  • 3)      Solitary Workers – 32%
  • 4)      Quiet Collaborators 12%

The most interesting chapter was about the Principal. After hearing the group’s presentation, I went back to the class website and read through the chapter closely.

  • Educational Change – Everyone feels misunderstood during the process of change. The role of the Principal has become more complex, less clear, and busier during the last 10 years.
  • Studies of the 80’s and 90’s of how a Principal spends their day – lots of individual meetings, rapid change of activities; spent lots of time with “putting out fires” and not reflective thinking. Too many things to do and couldn’t keep up with the pace and try to be all things to all people. Lots of energy spent to sense of order; maintaining resources; etc. not much strategic learning.
  • Action over words and the Principal is part of the change and involved in the planning despite of lack of expertise in every area.
  • Principals were judged by what they brought to the school. Leaders tend to focus on areas that they are strong at. Good principals spend 41% on program improvement and 34% building management.

In a 1989 study of 1,200 principals, effective ones were engaged in the four strategic interactions with teachers.  Very few (10%) in the various studies were found to be effective.

  • Resource Provider – Mobilize resources and district support to help achieve academic goals
  • Visible Presence
  • Instructional Resource – give advice and expertise to teachers
  • Communicator

Principals are middle managers, with the supporting and interacting with the teachers on one side and appeasing and reporting to the school director and Board of Trustees on the other.

Principals are so busy that they  spend a lot of time managing and not much time reflecting and doing, “transformational leadership.” Managing means designing and implementing plans, getting things done, working effectively with people. Leadership relates to the mission, inspiring, and direction.

Principals do have the freedom to think creatively or in unorthodox ways in running a school. The “system” tolerates both highly innovative principals and rigid, orthodox, “do not rock the boat” principals.

Principals need to spend some time in every department and be familiar with what the departments are doing. If he/she gives the HoD a carte blanche, then he/she is not being effective.

The personality and leadership style differed with effective principals. The important item was the activities they were engaged in. It seems the magic number is over 40% of your time spent improving curriculum/instruction and 30% spent managing. This is easier to do on the elementary level and gets harder in high school.

TCNJ Advanced Leadership Class

I am taking EDAD 617 Advanced Leadership class through the College of New Jersey. The College of New Jersey (TCNJ) holds courses for international school teachers on the Spanish island of Mallorca. I earned my Master’s degree from the program in the 90’s and it is nice to be back to see the old sites and refresh myself on educational administrative issues. The course will be two weeks every afternoon and there is a variety of educators, from PYP Coordinators, to Athletic Directors, US and International-based people, and a variety of ages. It is very stimulating to hear from other people. I’ll be blogging what I am learning from the class.

Yesterday’s big learning was the Theory of Situational Leadership. This concept was brought forth by Paul Hersey and Kenneth Blanchard in the late 70’s and early 80’s.  The theory states that different situations need different leadership styles. The two variables to consider are the following:

TASK – how much the leader communicates one-way in what, how, and when the project needs to be completed.

RELATIONSHIP – the extent the leader allows the colleague to take over a project

Directing Style – give specific instructions and closely supervise the performance of the follower

Coaching Style – give specific instructions closely supervise the task, but also explain directions and solicit suggestions and support progress toward completion.

Supportive Style – facilitate and support the efforts of followers and share responsibility for decision making

Delegating Style – turn over problem solving and decision making over to followers

Quad 1 – High Task / Low Relationship (directing) Quad 2 – High Task and High Relationship (coaching)
Quad 3 – Low Task / High Relationship (supporting) Quad 4 – Low Relationship and Low Task

(delegating)

The theory also takes into account the maturity (ability to get the job done and initiative) of the people a Principal is working with.

 

US Admissions Officers Survey

I read this in the New York Times this morning.

‘Independent thinkers’ sought by many schools

According to a survey of British and U.S. admissions officers, universities are looking for “independent thinkers.”

The research, conducted by ACS International Schools, which has three schools in Britain and one in Qatar, is carried out to measure the value of the International Baccalaureatediploma. The study was released July 6 to coincide with the day that I.B. diploma results were announced worldwide.

The survey found that 29 percent of U.S. admissions officers valued a demonstrated capacity for “independent inquiry” above any particular exam result. The next most sought-after quality was “in-depth subject expertise,” cited by 25 percent of respondents.

“American universities are looking first and foremost for students able to challenge conventional thinking and want to see clear evidence of this above all else in the qualifications and written submissions they receive from university applicants,” said Jeremy Lewis of ACS International Schools.

The survey also found that applications to U.S. universities have held up despite the economic downturn, with two-thirds of admissions officers in the United States saying that the number of incoming freshmen was better than expected. This contrasts with the response from Britain, where tuition fees have tripled and where only a quarter of admissions officers said that application numbers exceeded expectations.

— D.D. GUTTENPLAN

The International Baccalaureate is an excellent curriculum for providing those two characteristics (in bold) that university admission officers are looking for. I had never heard of ACS International Schools. They have four schools, three in the UK and one in Qatar, that uses a hybrid of the IB and British schooling models.

What We Can Learn From The Penn State Tragedy

I read most of the investigative report published this week. The investigation was conducted by former FBI (Federal Bureau of Investigation) Director, Mr. Louis Freeh.

For those non-Americans reading this post, I will brief you on the event. A retired North American Football Coach, Jerry Sandusky, was convicted of sexually abusing children at Pennsylvania State University. Penn State, as it is called, is a large (0ver 80,000 students) public university located in central Pennsylvania. The school is famous for its North American Football program and it legendary head coach, Joe Paterno. Coach Paterno led the football team for 46 years, before getting fired this season and dying of cancer shortly after.

I have an interest in this case because I wanted to see what mistakes were made from a school administrative viewpoint. I have been involved in dealing with employee misconduct in the past and will most likely come upon this in the future. The report gives the public a rare detailed look at how the university’s administrators handled the incidents. It was a sad tragedy for the boys hurt by Sandusky and I am disgusted at what happened.

The following are my learning points from the report:

  • I can’t believe how poorly Penn State Administrators handled the reports of Sandusky being seen showering with young boys. What adult educators shower with students???? This behavior alone, should have been grounds enough for immediate firing and banning from the campus, even without evidence of sexual abuse. This is not normal behavior and it is a big red flag that something bad is occurring. By “reports,” I specifically mean a mother, her son, and a coach complaining to university officials that Sandusky was in the shower with the boys.
  • When something important happens, start action immediately, regardless of it being a weekend or not. The report cited that Paterno waited to contact colleagues because he didn’t want to ruin their weekend. When it is this serious, forget about that.
  • The janitors saw an explicit act of sexual abuse but were afraid to report it. They are key personnel in cases like these because they are around the premises after hours and many times, community members forget that they are there. Janitors and other maintenance personnel can be more effective than security cameras at times. It is important to pay attention to them and make sure they are valued members of the school.
  • The administration was afraid of confrontation! They should have directly called Sandusky in and discussed the incidents with several members of the administration all present. I know it is distasteful, but no one mentioned the specific acts during interviews. It is very important for administrators to go straight to the heart of the matter and not avoid difficult conversations.
  • The university president did not report the investigation in 1998 and 2001 to the Board of Trustees. School Administrators need to keep the Board informed on incidents like this.
  • I learned the Clery Act is a law that obligates universities to document crimes and to give safety information to the school community so they can be informed regarding personal security. Penn State failed in complying to this law.

A jury recently found Sandusky guilty on 45 counts of sexual child abuse and he will spend the rest of his life in prison. In the report, the janitor recalls seeing Sandusky driving slowly by the locker rooms at 2:00 AM, after the janitor saw him with a boy in the showers. This tells me that Sandusky knew that he was doing wrong and was afraid of being caught.

How Are We Doing?

Every June I make a presentation at the ISB Board of Trustees public meeting of our students’ results in outside assessments. This includes a wide range of measures like the IB Diploma scores, Measures of Academic Progress (MAP), SAT (Scholastic Aptitude Test), etc. 

After this year’s presentation, several administration and board members asked me to publicize these results. In this tough economic climate, a goal for our school is to market itself to attract more students. This presentation will help! They show a high level of learning and just how strong academically our students are performing. We are not perfect and there are areas to improve, but the results indicate we are a high-performing school. This is not just what we do every day, although the quality of the curriculum and teachers does help, it also shows high socio-economic families that value education as well. 

One member of the Board asked if we discern the data between students who have been with us for a long time and recent students. We do not do this and it may be a project for next year. 

I am developing a Moodle page with all of our student learning data, including things like report card grades and attendance data, as well as the major assessments mentioned above. Below is my power point presentation to the Board which I uploaded to Scribd.com.